From GalleyCat. By “post-Obama,” I think she means the age in which Internet has come into its own as a vehicle for social transformation. Thoughts?
June, 2009
Toni Morrison on post-Obama writing
Saturday, June 6th, 2009Mountain Writers Conference
Thursday, June 4th, 2009Where: Hood River, Oregon
When: Sunday, June 21, 2009
Details: I’ll be attending with client Kezban Barzilay to learn and get inspired. She’s writing a beautiful memoir of her childhood in Izmir, Turkey, and I look forward to spending the day with a strong, talented, and interesting woman!
More information on the conference at www.mountainwriters.org.
When pathetic is good
Thursday, June 4th, 2009At the conference, writers attended a two-minutes, two-pages workshop in which we read our first two pages aloud to a panel of agents. The agents listened as though they were reading the pages on submission, and would say, “Stop,” whenever they would normally have lost interest in the writing. Then they explained why.
The number-one reason agents lost interest in writers’ first pages was a lack of action. (Agent Kristin Nelson blogs about her take on the problem here.) They often said the first pages contained too much description, either of the setting or of the character, and then offered the standard advice to begin in media res, in the middle of the action. But I believe it was agent Matthew Mahoney who made a telling point–a point which no one picked up on in the discussion.
He compared opening pages to the opening minutes of a film, and said that you need someone to root for, or the action is boring. Battle scenes, for instance, are a meaningless barrage if you don’t know who to worry about.
When I think about writing, I usually think about it in terms of the hale Aristotelian triad of pathos-logos-ethos (I blogged about this over on Greenkeys a while ago). In other words, writing that works well appeals to your audience’s hearts, minds, and sensibility. When we care about a character, that means the writer has done a good job with writing pathos into the scene. Which means that the most exciting battle scene in the world will never be a good one if every character in it remains anonymous.
This also means that the most important element in the opening pages of a novel is not really action, then, but character. A character gives meaning to the actions on the page. For instance, how much do we care about a child throwing a tantrum in the cereal aisle? How much more do we care if that scene is told from the mother’s point of view, when the tantrum is interspersed with someone telling her that she’s a crappy mom? As always, it depends on the writing, but the second situation would compel me to read on at least a bit further. I’d want to know how the mother responded, both to the tantrum and the criticism.
This is why good action scenes begin with attention to people–to point of view, character, and the who-what-how-and-why of a given person’s response to a situation. So I guess you could say that good writing is pathethic writing.
What the Steelers taught me about writing conferences
Monday, June 1st, 2009Growing up in Steelers country, I learned the phrase Monday morning quarterbacking young. Whatever happened to the boys in black and gold on Sunday afternoon, and whatever calls Bill Cowher made in the heat of the game, you can bet that hundreds of thousands of nonathletes across the Pittsburgh area would be swearing by Monday that they could have done it better.
The conference was a success. But today, I am looking back at my three days at Backspace and seeing some things that I’d like to do differently next time.
- I shouldn’t have written my pitch on the plane. I should have written it at least a month before, and practiced it with E, my parents, my friends, and whoever else would listen until I could say it in my sleep–or better, until I could reel it off when I was nervous.
- I should have run my query letter past my critique group at least once. The agents cut me off halfway through, saying it was too long and too scattered. I could have gotten more out of the critique had I presented a later draft.
- I should have also practiced the answers to some questions about my novel that I knew people were likely to ask: Why blue? Why the Israel-Palestine conflict? What folktale in particular gives Elspeth the power to manipulate how people see her? I have lived and breathed these answers for the past 18 months, but still fumbled to articulate them.
The game is over, it’s Monday, and I came through the weekend with a win, albeit with a few bruises. (Actually, thanks to my heeled sandals, the wounds are on my feet, and recall Yeats: “To be born woman is to know — / Although they do not talk of it at school — / That we must labour to be beautiful.”)
I did some things right, too. I showed up with a finished manuscript. I took lots of notes at the panels. I took notes during my critique. I made my top priority “having fun and meeting people,” which took some of the pressure off and resulted in some lovely new friends. All told, it was a good game to kick off the season–of submissions.
Recent Blog Posts
- Going once…
- Synopsis of SHAHIDA
- Atwood and Ghosh respond
- Laura Miller makes a Möbius Strip.
- Why do we read?
- A resource for writers, editors, and book clubs
- The kicker/screamer’s guide to endurance sports
- beat (n.)
- plot point (n.)
- clarity (n.)
Archives
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- November 2008
- May 2008
- January 2008
Links: Literary Magazines
Links: Writing Resources
Writers
Writing advice
You are currently browsing the Sarah Cypher blog archives for June, 2009.

