March, 2010

On rediscovering the art of bad writing

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

I used to hate first drafts. I hated them because when you write them, everything you learned not to do slips past your inner editor, supplying you with endless free refills of angsty metaphors and an all-you-can-eat buffet of bad paragraphs. Then your inner editor notices that you’re writing dreck, and she gets all puckery and cuts you off completely. Some call this writer’s block, but you don’t call it that because, as your inner editor has reminded you tartly, “writer’s block” is also a cliche. Nothing makes a writer feel worse than a first draft.

But this time, it helps to have finished a novel already. It’s easier to dismiss the editor and accept Anne Lamott’s permission to write shitty first drafts. It also helps to have finished an outline and synopsis of the new novel, and know that my shitty first draft is the equivalent of wandering around on the wrong street of the right neighborhood.

It’s too early to say if the new novel is going well, but I am enjoying the writing process more than I expected. Every draft is a chance to try a new method, and this time is different, too: even though there’s a plan, the characters still need voices, and the novel still needs to find its tone. I’m trying to write each chapter as it comes, then go back and revise it for scene structure and character development. Mainly I’m trying to have fun and experiment freely, because the inner editor hates fun and is all about the rules.

More than anything else, writing is better than not writing. While researching and outlining, I missed the moments in the shower or in the grocery line when my mind wandered to whatever problem I left unsolved that morning. I missed the sense of losing track of time. I missed listening to my draft, and responding–and I missed watching first drafts turn into second drafts that eventually turned into a novel.

It's just as possible to have fun here...

It's just as possible to have fun here...

...as it is to have fun out here.

...as it is to have fun out here.

What I’ve learned about indie publishing so far

Friday, March 12th, 2010
Proofreading fail!

Proofreading fail!

1.Typographical errors are more difficult to get rid of than cockroaches.

2. Never, never, never assume you can do it alone. “Indie publishing” means “not a Big Six publisher.” It does not mean, “I am an island of astounding writing, editorial, graphic design, technological, and business savvy.”

3. At first you will feel like you’ve just been given twenty dollars in change for a five, because you can put your book on Amazon whenever you want.

4. And when that feeling wears off, you realize, “Oh shit. It will be on Amazon whenever I put it there.” See #1.

5. When you publish yourself, it’s easier to remember that you are writing for readers, not for the approval of a system.

6. People will automatically assume your book sucks because it’s not from Random House. They could possibly be right. Therefore, do your best work and see #2 and #5. If they still assume your work sucks, thank them for their opinion, and then advise them under your breath to go to hell.

7. There are a lot of other indie-published writers. Yet indie publishing is an unknown phenomenon unless you are a writer or work in the publishing industry. We writers should work together to change that.

8. Put profiles on Twitter, Facebook, SPANnet.org, and the Association of Independent Publishers, and participate in a helpful way. Offer advice on subjects you understand, and ask questions about ones you don’t.

9. Start marketing your book early. Take advantage of all opportunities, but be careful not plug your work too often. Also remember that your threshold for “too often” is much higher than everyone else’s.

10. Get quality blurbs and reviews.

11. Never hesitate to ask people you trust for their opinion of the book before it goes to press. (See #2.) Those early readers are likely to tell you things you don’t want to hear, but at least they will be constructive about it, and you still have time to make changes.

12. Research your publishing options thoroughly. If you have a lazy streak, be honest with yourself about it, and check your work with an expert. (See #10). People are surprisingly helpful.

A flawed but earnest study of publishing methods

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

I have begun an unscientific experiment in publishing. It’s unscientific because the sample size is statistically insignificant, and I am comparing a nonfiction guide to a novel. But bear with me.

Participant A is my yet-unpublished novel, THE IDIOT’S TALE. I know you won’t take my word for it if I told you it’s a good book, so I’ll just say that by my own measures, it is a manuscript that I will still be proud of in ten years. Much like an intergalactic space probe, it is traveling through a great silent void known as the New York publishing industry, and we hopeful scientists can do nothing but wait a long time for word of its happy landing somewhere.

Participant B is my soon-to-be-printed THE EDITOR’S LEXICON: ESSENTIAL WRITING TERMS FOR NOVELISTS. It is a very brief dictionary of writing terms meant for fiction writers who have not studied writing in school, and early reviews by other editors and writers are strongly positive. I have decided to publish it independently, as an e-book through Smashwords, and as a print book through Lightning Source. My sole companion on this journey is my friend, client, and now publisher, William Campbell of Glyd-Evans Press.

As a writer, my three main goals are to (1) dedicate as much of myself as possible to a craft without losing my sanity, (2) be read, and (3) make a living at it. Therefore, this experiment will take many years to complete. It will compare ease of publication, the effort and expense to promote each book, profit, and my overall satisfaction with the final result—in other words, “Was it worth it? Should I have done it differently? Do I feel like I’ve connected with an audience? Which route would I recommend to others?”

Right now, I can only collect data from Participant B. I will be posting it over the next few weeks, as THE EDITOR’S LEXICON approaches its publication date. As for Participant A, it has entered a shaky orbit around one particular agent, but it’s traversing the dark side of that moon and we can only hope that a positive signal will reach our satellites by this time next month.

  • Archives

You are currently browsing the Sarah Cypher blog archives for March, 2010.