agents

I give thanks for good readers.

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

I’m blessed with some very good first readers. They’re all great writers and editors, and their responses helped me get out of my own head and tell a better story. I’m also blessed with a partner who is not a writer, and as I learned this week, that opinion is worth a manuscript’s weight in gold.

Every writer needs someone to treat the characters like people, and express dismay when they do things that pull their story off track. Every writer needs to know when the novel stops working, even if the reader can’t explain why. Sitting at the breakfast table yesterday, talking over sticky plates, a few leftover pumpkin pancakes and coffee, I learned that when all other revision efforts have failed, the best critiques sometimes look like a shrug, sound like an, “I didn’t get it, sorry,” and are offered with love.

So, now having more or less figured out what an agent was saying when she said the novel comes apart at the end, I am revising it one more time and will resubmit it in December, and send it to other agents if I can. I also have to clean up the synopsis of the next novel, so that while THE IDIOT’S TALE is on submission, I can make progress with something else. But first we have to eat sweet potato casserole and pie. Happy Thanksgiving.

…longed for the rhythmic pounding of the surf, and the salty sea air.*

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

Pacific Street, Rockaway Beach, Oregon

Pacific Street, Rockaway Beach, Oregon

What news? Pending my annual, five-day writing retreat at Rockaway Beach, I wanted to update my blog in grand Internet fashion: using a lot of words to say, basically, nothing much. Reseach on Book 2 continues at a loping pace thanks to Matt Beynon Rees, the prolific former Jerusalem bureau chief for TIME, whose information-dense Website and Palestinian mystery novels are giving me a lot of reading to do.

The weeklong retreat is meant as a turbo-outlining session, which means I ought to know what the novel is actually about in ten days or fewer. However, an agent promised to send revision notes on THE IDIOT’S TALE, and if those show up before I shut down my e-mail for a week, I will instead be knitting loose seams in the novel’s final third — all the while burning palm leaves, chanting quietly, Dear God please let it be good enough.

What other news? I finished my longest bike ever, at 80 miles. I turned the heat on in my office for the first time. E and I made killer fajitas, grilled corn, and mulled cider. Hello, autumn.

* We continue with our nascent endeavor to title every post using narrative cliches.

Submissions update

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

A partial manuscript and full manuscript submission are still pending, and the good news of a few weeks ago (a cold query that turned into a request for a partial) came back with a form rejection last week. It’s been two months since the conference, and I am now wondering if I should query the remaining four agents from Backspace–just to keep this search from stagnating, and to prevent the May 30 conference from sliding even further into the distant past.

I’ve heard conflicting opinions about submitting queries in August. The publishing industry goes on vacation, say some. But other agents say they use the quiet month to catch up on queries, and that it is actually a good time to submit work. Any writers out there have personal experience with this?

Throwing away good news

Friday, July 17th, 2009

In a rush to get through the mail, I noticed my own handwriting on a #10 envelope. Always a bad sign when you have material on submission.

So, determined not to let it distract me from E’s departure for California, and repeating to myself Liz Rosenberg’s comment about “collecting your no’s,” I thumbed open the SASE, glanced at the brief form letter inside, stuffed it under my arm and waved goodbye to E.

I admit I was a little pissed. I took a considerable amount of time with the query, seeing as the agent represents a very good Palestinian-American novelist whose work I admire. As I climbed the stairs back to the apartment, I decided just to recycle the letter, make a note of the rejection in my Excel spreadsheet, and forget about it. But still. I only sent the dang thing a week ago. It must have barely seen the light of office ceiling before the agent’s assistant stuffed a rejection into my SASE.

But before dumping everything into the recycle bag, I took one more look. I read the letter again, and my eyes still went to the last line: “…forgive the form letter, but the volume of inquiries we receive obliges us to respond in this manner.” OK, just like every other rejection I’ve received in the mail. But this is weird, I thought–why is there an address in the body of the letter? So, I read it from the top.

Dear writer,

Thank you for your interest. Please do send the first 50 pages, a copy of this letter, and a SASE to…

Oh. They want a partial. In my letter I believe I’ll write

Dear agent,

Thank you for your interest. Your generous request for a partial nearly ruined my day. Enclosed please find the requested material.

Warm regards,
An optimist by nature
A writer by trade
A pessimist by training.

What the Steelers taught me about writing conferences

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Growing up in Steelers country, I learned the phrase Monday morning quarterbacking young. Whatever happened to the boys in black and gold on Sunday afternoon, and whatever calls Bill Cowher made in the heat of the game, you can bet that hundreds of thousands of nonathletes across the Pittsburgh area would be swearing by Monday that they could have done it better.

The conference was a success. But today, I am looking back at my three days at Backspace and seeing some things that I’d like to do differently next time.

  • I shouldn’t have written my pitch on the plane. I should have written it at least a month before, and practiced it with E, my parents, my friends, and whoever else would listen until I could say it in my sleep–or better, until I could  reel it off  when I was nervous.
  • I should have run my query letter past my critique group at least once. The agents cut me off halfway through, saying it was too long and too scattered. I could have gotten more out of the critique had I presented a later draft.
  • I should have also practiced the answers to some questions about my novel that I knew people were likely to ask: Why blue? Why the Israel-Palestine conflict? What folktale in particular gives Elspeth the power to manipulate how people see her? I have lived and breathed these answers for the past 18 months, but still fumbled to articulate them.

The game is over, it’s Monday, and I came through the weekend with a win, albeit with a few bruises. (Actually, thanks to my heeled sandals, the wounds are on my feet, and recall Yeats: “To be born woman is to know — / Although they do not talk of it at school — / That we must labour to be beautiful.”)

I did some things right, too. I showed up with a finished manuscript. I took lots of notes at the panels. I took notes during my critique. I made my top priority “having fun and meeting people,” which took some of the pressure off and resulted in some lovely new friends. All told, it was a good game to kick off the season–of submissions.

From Saturday's peregrinations

From Saturday's peregrinations

Oh, what you can see in comfortable shoes!

Oh, what you can see in comfortable shoes!