agents

Throwing away good news

Friday, July 17th, 2009

In a rush to get through the mail, I noticed my own handwriting on a #10 envelope. Always a bad sign when you have material on submission.

So, determined not to let it distract me from E’s departure for California, and repeating to myself Liz Rosenberg’s comment about “collecting your no’s,” I thumbed open the SASE, glanced at the brief form letter inside, stuffed it under my arm and waved goodbye to E.

I admit I was a little pissed. I took a considerable amount of time with the query, seeing as the agent represents a very good Palestinian-American novelist whose work I admire. As I climbed the stairs back to the apartment, I decided just to recycle the letter, make a note of the rejection in my Excel spreadsheet, and forget about it. But still. I only sent the dang thing a week ago. It must have barely seen the light of office ceiling before the agent’s assistant stuffed a rejection into my SASE.

But before dumping everything into the recycle bag, I took one more look. I read the letter again, and my eyes still went to the last line: “…forgive the form letter, but the volume of inquiries we receive obliges us to respond in this manner.” OK, just like every other rejection I’ve received in the mail. But this is weird, I thought–why is there an address in the body of the letter? So, I read it from the top.

Dear writer,

Thank you for your interest. Please do send the first 50 pages, a copy of this letter, and a SASE to…

Oh. They want a partial. In my letter I believe I’ll write

Dear agent,

Thank you for your interest. Your generous request for a partial nearly ruined my day. Enclosed please find the requested material.

Warm regards,
An optimist by nature
A writer by trade
A pessimist by training.

What the Steelers taught me about writing conferences

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Growing up in Steelers country, I learned the phrase Monday morning quarterbacking young. Whatever happened to the boys in black and gold on Sunday afternoon, and whatever calls Bill Cowher made in the heat of the game, you can bet that hundreds of thousands of nonathletes across the Pittsburgh area would be swearing by Monday that they could have done it better.

The conference was a success. But today, I am looking back at my three days at Backspace and seeing some things that I’d like to do differently next time.

  • I shouldn’t have written my pitch on the plane. I should have written it at least a month before, and practiced it with E, my parents, my friends, and whoever else would listen until I could say it in my sleep–or better, until I could  reel it off  when I was nervous.
  • I should have run my query letter past my critique group at least once. The agents cut me off halfway through, saying it was too long and too scattered. I could have gotten more out of the critique had I presented a later draft.
  • I should have also practiced the answers to some questions about my novel that I knew people were likely to ask: Why blue? Why the Israel-Palestine conflict? What folktale in particular gives Elspeth the power to manipulate how people see her? I have lived and breathed these answers for the past 18 months, but still fumbled to articulate them.

The game is over, it’s Monday, and I came through the weekend with a win, albeit with a few bruises. (Actually, thanks to my heeled sandals, the wounds are on my feet, and recall Yeats: “To be born woman is to know — / Although they do not talk of it at school — / That we must labour to be beautiful.”)

I did some things right, too. I showed up with a finished manuscript. I took lots of notes at the panels. I took notes during my critique. I made my top priority “having fun and meeting people,” which took some of the pressure off and resulted in some lovely new friends. All told, it was a good game to kick off the season–of submissions.

From Saturday's peregrinations

From Saturday's peregrinations

Oh, what you can see in comfortable shoes!

Oh, what you can see in comfortable shoes!

Day 2 in NY

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Thursday was Agent-Author Day. That means that I showed up at the Radisson with 25 copies of my query letter, my first two manuscript pages, and a piece of paper that now looks like a paranoiac’s last will and testament. That would be my pitch, fully revised four times while sitting in the back row of Bella Stander’s pitch workshop yesterday evening–because never again will I be caught with crickets-to-say when three agents ask me what my novel is about in front of 25 other writers.

The agents were smart, gracious, and helpful; and what impressed me was how quickly they could articulate what worked or didn’t work in the material. As as editor and book reviewer I understand what it’s like to put a slippery emotional reaction into a coherent and useful response, so I can appreciate quick thinking when I see it. (I even had some great examples scribbled down on the hotel’s complimentary notebook, but a volunteer spirited it away during break and replaced it with with a fresh one. Ah well.)

The writers deserve the biggest kudos, though. If it takes a lot to share your work in a hometown workshop, it takes some adamantine nerve to stand up and read your work to literary agents who don’t know you from Adam. To listen quietly, and take notes, and say thank you–even when they cut you off after a few paragraphs. Even when you hear, “The writing just didn’t grab me,” or, “It’s a thriller, but I’m not thrilled,” or, “That’s a hard story to tell well.” That takes not only professionalism, but courage.

The day went well, and I got some offers to submit my novel. I also met some really cool writers, and I’m looking forward to a low-key day of attending panels with them today. I’d also planned to start the day with a rainy run in Central Park, but ohmygoodness, look at the time.

  • Archives