conferences

The cosmic I is watching you

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

A few weekends ago I attended a three-hour memoir workshop with screenwriter and memoirist Annick Smith—

(Belated post, I know. I’ve also been moving across town, and you would have no idea how well and neatly I had packed my old apartment with things I didn’t need. Lessons learned: accept only edible gifts, love your local Goodwill, don’t own a piano if you live on the third floor of a walk-up and are too frugal to hire movers.)

—anyway, Annick Smith. Her opening lecture on nonfiction and memory was great, albeit somewhat of a repackaging of techniques carried over from fiction. The narrator is a character. “I” is a character. Therefore, in writing creative nonfiction, you are creating a character who is very much like you, but will never be you exactly. She said that in memoir the “I” is a free thing, free of linear story, free to roam and encompass a mind. The goal of writing memoir, then, is you can’t achieve truth (verisimilitude, pathos, rapport with the reader, whatever you want to call it) by writing story, but to write an entire mind. This is the cosmic I.

She also said to shrug off the guilt of writing all about yourself, because good memoir is not really all about you. It’s about writing about your experience so that readers can see themselves in it. So, your memoir is ultimately about your reader. This is also the cosmic I.

Finally, she offered some technical advice. The first draft is always easy–scrawl it down, reel it off, follow your mind where it leads you. The second draft is about finding the lies. Memoir writing is psychotherapeutic, it seems; we tell ourselves lies, and hold onto erroneous details in memory, so that we can maintain a comfortable self-image. In order to get to the truth, however, we must use revision to find the errors in our own memories, and correct them. From that, we make it possible for the reader to see themselves in everything that is uncomfortable, illogical, gauche, vulnerable, and silly in our own lives. I suppose this is the cosmic I, too.

So, if the cosmic I happened to be watching me sort out my belongings this week, it might have wondered why I kept the piano, which I never play; why I got rid of the bathrobe that I wore almost every morning. Why I kept cornmeal, vinegar, corn syrup, and peanut sauce; but why I packed away the silverware that my mother set out at every dinner of my childhood, and taped up the box, and put it in a far corner of storage. It’s a good subject for another post, probably.

Mountain Writers Conference

Thursday, June 4th, 2009
What: Mountain Writers “Memory and Place” workshop, taught by Annick Smith
Where: Hood River, Oregon
When: Sunday, June 21, 2009

Details: I’ll be attending with client Kezban Barzilay to learn and get inspired. She’s writing a beautiful memoir of her childhood in Izmir, Turkey, and I look forward to spending the day with a strong, talented, and interesting woman!

More information on the conference at www.mountainwriters.org.

When pathetic is good

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

At the conference, writers attended a two-minutes, two-pages workshop in which we read our first two pages aloud to a panel of agents. The agents listened as though they were reading the pages on submission, and would say, “Stop,” whenever they would normally have lost interest in the writing. Then they explained why.

The number-one reason agents lost interest in writers’ first pages was a lack of action. (Agent Kristin Nelson blogs about her take on the problem here.) They often said the first pages contained too much description, either of the setting or of the character, and then offered the standard advice to begin in media res, in the middle of the action. But I believe it was agent Matthew Mahoney who made a telling point–a point which no one picked up on in the discussion.

He compared opening pages to the opening minutes of a film, and said that you need someone to root for, or the action is boring. Battle scenes, for instance, are a meaningless barrage if you don’t know who to worry about.

When I think about writing, I usually think about it in terms of the hale Aristotelian triad of pathos-logos-ethos (I blogged about this over on Greenkeys a while ago). In other words, writing that works well appeals to your audience’s hearts, minds, and sensibility. When we care about a character, that means the writer has done a good job with writing pathos into the scene. Which means that the most exciting battle scene in the world will never be a good one if every character in it remains anonymous.

This also means that the most important element in the opening pages of a novel is not really action, then, but character. A character gives meaning to the actions on the page. For instance, how much do we care about a child throwing a tantrum in the cereal aisle? How much more do we care if that scene is told from the mother’s point of view, when the tantrum is interspersed with someone telling her that she’s a crappy mom? As always, it depends on the writing, but the second situation would compel me to read on at least a bit further. I’d want to know how the mother responded, both to the tantrum and the criticism.

This is why good action scenes begin with attention to people–to point of view, character, and the who-what-how-and-why of a given person’s response to a situation. So I guess you could say that good writing is pathethic writing.

What the Steelers taught me about writing conferences

Monday, June 1st, 2009

Growing up in Steelers country, I learned the phrase Monday morning quarterbacking young. Whatever happened to the boys in black and gold on Sunday afternoon, and whatever calls Bill Cowher made in the heat of the game, you can bet that hundreds of thousands of nonathletes across the Pittsburgh area would be swearing by Monday that they could have done it better.

The conference was a success. But today, I am looking back at my three days at Backspace and seeing some things that I’d like to do differently next time.

  • I shouldn’t have written my pitch on the plane. I should have written it at least a month before, and practiced it with E, my parents, my friends, and whoever else would listen until I could say it in my sleep–or better, until I could  reel it off  when I was nervous.
  • I should have run my query letter past my critique group at least once. The agents cut me off halfway through, saying it was too long and too scattered. I could have gotten more out of the critique had I presented a later draft.
  • I should have also practiced the answers to some questions about my novel that I knew people were likely to ask: Why blue? Why the Israel-Palestine conflict? What folktale in particular gives Elspeth the power to manipulate how people see her? I have lived and breathed these answers for the past 18 months, but still fumbled to articulate them.

The game is over, it’s Monday, and I came through the weekend with a win, albeit with a few bruises. (Actually, thanks to my heeled sandals, the wounds are on my feet, and recall Yeats: “To be born woman is to know — / Although they do not talk of it at school — / That we must labour to be beautiful.”)

I did some things right, too. I showed up with a finished manuscript. I took lots of notes at the panels. I took notes during my critique. I made my top priority “having fun and meeting people,” which took some of the pressure off and resulted in some lovely new friends. All told, it was a good game to kick off the season–of submissions.

From Saturday's peregrinations

From Saturday's peregrinations

Oh, what you can see in comfortable shoes!

Oh, what you can see in comfortable shoes!

Last day in NY

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

The third and final day of the conference was theoretically the same length as the others, but thanks to a combination of sunny weather, fatigue, and mental overload, it ended for me after only three hours. I had done what I’d come to do–meet nice people, learn, and figure out what to do next with my manuscript. Anything more was gravy: the yucky kind that looks like melted candle wax.

To be fair, everybody seemed a bit paler and grumpier come Saturday morning. More than a few cut out at noon. I went back uptown for my run in Central Park, then showered and walked around the Village in comfortable shoes until L was free for dinner. By the time we were on the subway headed home, the conference seemed a bit surreal. I regret not going to the final coffee hour, if only to bring closure to the experience.

Overall, I expected a rude awakening. To hear that my writing was still crap, still obscure, still pensive-but-puzzling. Instead, I learned that my manuscript will probably at least get some request for partials, that I need to shorten my query letter, and that agents are human. (I knew that, but needed to see for myself.) It’s a good start.

Stay tuned for more on what I learned about book publicity, what’s hot in publishing right now, and other stuff that is in my already-packed-away notes.

Last night at L's

Last night at L's