miscellany

Breast cancer is not a pink ribbon.

Monday, October 10th, 2011

I spent the weekend watching my partner’s aunt in her last days of life. Maricela Ochoa passed on this morning around 5 a.m. after a five-year fight with breast cancer. She was 48. I knew her as cool Tia Mari, the actress, the activist, the 5’3″ spitfire with a voice the size of her native Texas, the woman who outlived her doctor’s dead-end timeline by over two years.

Sometime around midnight on Saturday, it began to piss me off that NFL players wear pink gloves and shoes, that the cable music channel displays a pink ribbon, that you can buy all kinds of things in powder pink to make a statement. I was standing in the living room at the head of Mari’s hospital bed, looking at the fissure lines on her skull that showed beneath her dark fuzz of hair. For hours she made choked, drowning sounds; the sound of barely not suffocating, of having a 5’3″ body full of malfunctioning organs. Her skin was faintly greenish-purple, as if the light around her bed were distorted. She had not eaten or had water in four days; and her mouth–with its trim, exact lips and perfect teeth–hung open. I wondered about the lines she had spoken onstage and before cameras, the slogans she chanted in antiwar protests, the countless times her mouth opened and closed in her life to give shape to the billowing ribbons of opinion, feeling, and confession that run through us all.

Whereas pink ribbons have absolutely nothing to do with cancer. Just like yellow ribbons haven’t got a damn thing to do with our kids who die in the desert; nor does the flag pin, that glorified tie tack, do enough to stop our elected leaders from sending them there. Not all symbols are created equal. I believe Tia Mari would agree with me that there is neither a factory nor a product designer in the world that can manufacture a symbol that makes us feel, in our very bones and tissues, how fragile we are. How fragile all of us are, and that our body’s inevitable termination demands the most constant and careful self-questioning about what it means to be brave, to have compassion, and exist as much as possible in a state worthwhile to other people.

I learned to write in a school that advises writers to tell every story as if to a dying person. More than ever, today I try to imagine dying: Like everybody else, I can’t take my body. I can’t take symbols. I have to go without language, my life’s biggest asset and biggest crutch. What matters then? If I am to be a victim of cancer, or some other awful and average killer, what matters is that the people whom I loved know precisely how much I loved them. That my wife is OK. That I spent enough of my time doing things that made me feel excited or passionate or humbled; that a few of those things give my family a feeling of vicarious pride. All good storytelling requires empathy of both the teller and the listener, so in my last days of life I hope I can still listen to a story. I want that story to be so colorful, so specific, so powerful, and so meaningful that I can’t tell the difference between its life and mine.

Cancer is a way that living things die–people, dogs, mice. It is a natural killer. Cancer dollars will never buy a satisfactory cure, because who is ever ready to leave? It is hard enough to smile for the dying. It is like trying to lift a house. I imagine Mari must have understood better than anyone that life is no rehearsal, and we need the most colorful, specific, powerful, and yes, meaningful, memories to relive when we are too weak and too medicated to open our eyes again.

Congrats, Mari. Your life is big. I wish I could have seen you act in your favorite play, but I’m a better person for at least having heard your voice, some of the strong things you said with it, and seen you just last week singing and dancing to spite your cancer. I think it’s awesome that less than a month ago you were in a Huffington Post article, and you yourself said, “We’re living. We’re human beings. We’re not just a little pink ribbon.”

Fiction or nonfiction?

Thursday, September 29th, 2011

A conversation on Goodreads sparked a question this morning. A reader mentioned that polls show a decline in for-pleasure reading after school, which reminded me of another poll I’d seen: Of the people who still pick up books in their spare time, fewer and fewer showed any interest in novels.

Salem bookshop, fall 2010

I wonder about reading fiction for pleasure versus reading nonfiction for, well, maybe not pleasure but at least personal edification. My best friend’s father, a staunchly practical pathologist in Saudi, once told me–staunchly of course–”I don’t read fiction. I don’t like to be lied to.” I’ve heard this opinion variously watered down over the years, always with either a note of apology or self-satisfaction. I have to admit, I understood my friend’s father’s reaction better than the apologetic or self-satisfied ones.

On one hand, at least they’re reading. Great! But on the other, is fiction considered frivolous? A confection for one’s extra-extra spare time? There is such a desire to be “smart” in our culture, with a paradoxical disdain of anything that tries to be intellectual; so are readers impelled to pick up nonfiction in their private hours to earn a share of voice in the next conversation? Our culture values speaking over listening, and nonfiction is more apt to give us something to say.

I read fiction and nonfiction both. I need them to keep both my heart and my mind open. Choosing a favorite would be like having to choose between dark chocolate and red wine.

What do you think?

Confessions of a bibliophile

Friday, September 23rd, 2011

http://www.urbanspoon.com/u/profile/31640/ERiC-AiXeLsyD.htmlThe winter of 2000 was my junior year in college. It was a nocturnal, cloistered, literary year, and I lived in a triangle between Carnegie Mellon’s English building, the 61C coffee shop on Murray Avenue, and Three Penny Books, a used bookstore next door to the cafe. Its owner was an insomniac who kept the store open well past last-call, and he drew most of his business from a late-night crowd of students and the neighborhood’s sleepless old men. On my way home from studying, if the bus schedule allowed, I’d peruse the sidewalk cart in the glow of the front window’s Christmas lights, or go inside and examine the serpentine trail of novels that rounded the baseboards.

Two years later, after a series of semi-connected events that included 9/11, graduation, a cross-country move to Oregon, and quitting a dead-end job, I started my book editing business. In honor of Three Penny Books, I called it The Threepenny Editor. And at Christmastime, I went back to Pittsburgh for a visit and had my first real conversation with the owner; I gave him my card and told him how much his store meant to me. In one of life’s sad synchronicities, he told me that he was closing the store in a few weeks; like so many booksellers, he was pulling up stakes and moving his shop online.

We became friends. We started a thing that didn’t go well. But when he dispatched the last of his inventory, he made a generous gift that ranked among one of the best I’ve received in my life: the Encyclopedia Britannica 11, a noiseless Remington portable typewriter, a 1936 Royal typewriter, and a bookshelf of Orientalist relics ranging from Charles Doughty’s Travels in Arabia Deserta to Albert Hourani’s A History of the Arab Peoples to N.M. Penzer’s The Harem.

Fast forward again, to five homes and four states later. These artifacts of Three Penny Books sit about six feet from my desk. They look nice but I usually don’t think about them. I have a business to run; and until my wife finishes medical school, I do all the cooking and housekeeping. Although people remember Sisyphus for struggling eternally with his boulder, he should have been glad not to have the task of cooking for two marathoners. I find that the mundane has a way of fogging up days at a time, and I wonder what my twenty-year-old self would think about living in San Antonio and being known among friends mainly for the quality of her stuffed mushrooms.

Literary ecumenicalism is stamped all over my memory of that bookstore, twisted into its front-window Christmas lights, inseparable from memories of college and coffee and walking home with a messenger bag full of books at midnight in a rainy Pittsburgh winter.

And I realized this made me sad. So yesterday, I turned off the computer. I watered the garden. And then, purely for the hell of it, I pulled N.M. Penzer’s The Harem off the shelf. I discovered that the illustrations among its broad, yellowed pages fold out into maps of the sultan’s palace, and that all male heirs to the throne were educated and imprisoned in a royal school called The Cage. But mostly, the book evoked Pittsburgh winters and being twenty and so absolutely excited about a brilliant, unknown future that I could afford to take my optimism about it for granted.

You know what I love about books? As easily as a map unfolds from the leaves of a forgotten volume, the right one at the right time can relocate one’s sense of curiosity and optimism. The uncharted world of a new manuscript is one of the few pristine frontiers left to explore. So today, on this first day of fall, I’m putting aside the spiritual catatonia that always descends between novels, and resolving to outline my next project by the end of October.

Thoughts while driving through San Antonio sprawl

Saturday, September 3rd, 2011

I re-read a 2009 Harper’s article by Jamaica Kincaid that asked why we need art and artists. Basically, she said, art is not for its own sake but to help us deal with human mystery–to access a sense of a greater mystery, a secret order to the world. It’s a secret, maybe, because one’s mind is a mystery most of the time; it’s full of stamps from childhood and forgotten infancy. As Jamaica Kincaid says, sometimes she doubts that she ever acts independently of her mother–that every act is a reaction, a response, or a reflection.

In Islam, it’s believed that when we die an angel must pull our soul free from where it is lodged in our throat. I wonder if art tries to do the same thing–to snag something secret and intimate to us, and pull it out into plain view. As I drive my errands around San Antonio, expending more gasoline in a few months than I’ve done in the last 10 years of my life, passing yet another crop of strip malls and filling stations and nail salons and chain restaurants, it occurs to me that Art–in the capital letter sense of the word–is like those angels. It reaches for what’s inside of us and pulls it out to remind us that we are not the landscape. It keeps us from choking on the banal.

A few notes from Robert Pinsky’s “Is Vision the Twin of Speech?” (Bernard Osher lecture at Portland Art Museum).

Monday, March 7th, 2011

As a past national Poet Laureate, Robert Pinsky launched the Favorite Poem Project, a collection of ordinary Americans reading lines from their favorite poems. The project grew from his conviction, which he expressed at tonight’s lecture at the Portland Art Museum, that America struggles from a lack of a unified folk culture and of a unified class culture (the “snob” factor). He argued that without grandmothers to pass down distinctly “American” stories, dances, and recipes, and without a hereditary elite to guard and pass on “American” high culture, the work of inventing our culture is multiethnic, democratic, and continuous.

He opened the speech with a statement that I am still thinking about: That we are a great nation with vast economic and military power. But are we a great people? He spoke with a poet’s respect for the human ear–for the need to hear ideas slowly, a second or even third time, to give the mind time to circle and inspect the words. So imagine his slow, slightly gravely voice asking, a second and third time, A people… Are we a great people?

Part of his lecture featured clips from the Favorite Poem Project, one of them an high-achieving Chinese immigrant high school student, whose favorite poem is Emily Dickison’s “I’m Nobody! Who are You?” She read it aloud in the park at Stone Mountain, Georgia–what she called her favorite place. After the clip, Robert Pinsky called attention to the relief carving on the rock behind her, of slave-era heroes Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, and Jefferson Davis. “She is a smart girl,” he said. “Someday she will think about that carving, and wonder how slavery is part of the culture she is living today.” (Slightly paraphrased, with apologies.)

He closed with a reading of William Carlos Williams’s “To Elsie”:

The pure products of America
go crazy—
mountain folk from Kentucky

or the ribbed north end of
Jersey
with its isolate lakes and

valleys, its deaf-mutes, thieves
old names
and promiscuity between

devil-may-care men who have taken
to railroading
out of sheer lust of adventure—

and young slatterns, bathed
in filth
from Monday to Saturday

to be tricked out that night
with gauds
from imaginations which have no

peasant traditions to give them
character
but flutter and flaunt

sheer rags—succumbing without
emotion
save numbed terror

under some hedge of choke-cherry
or viburnum—
which they cannot express—

Unless it be that marriage
perhaps
with a dash of Indian blood

will throw up a girl so desolate
so hemmed round
with disease or murder

that she’ll be rescued by an
agent—
reared by the state and

sent out at fifteen to work in
some hard-pressed
house in the suburbs—

some doctor’s family, some Elsie—
voluptuous water
expressing with broken

brain the truth about us—
her great
ungainly hips and flopping breasts

addressed to cheap
jewelry
and rich young men with fine eyes

as if the earth under our feet
were
an excrement of some sky

and we degraded prisoners
destined
to hunger until we eat filth

while the imagination strains
after deer
going by fields of goldenrod in

the stifling heat of September
Somehow
it seems to destroy us

It is only in isolate flecks that
something
is given off

No one
to witness
and adjust, no one to drive the car

(From The Poetry Foundation)

  • Archives