publishing

Laura Miller makes a Möbius Strip.

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

In yesterday’s Salon article, “Why Men Don’t Read,” Laura Miller quotes a blogger who “made the Möbius-strip-like argument that if today’s men were truly manly they wouldn’t be scared away from reading by its reputation for unmanliness.”

And then she goes on to make a fine Möbius Strip of her own, saying that in the publishing industry, editors’ salaries are so low because most editors are women. Besides content, the only thing the article is missing is that blameless and vapid phrase, “Well, I’m just sayin’…”

Read the rest of the article here.

What I’ve learned about indie publishing so far

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Proofreading fail!

Proofreading fail!

1.Typographical errors are more difficult to get rid of than cockroaches.

2. Never, never, never assume you can do it alone. “Indie publishing” means “not a Big Six publisher.” It does not mean, “I am an island of astounding writing, editorial, graphic design, technological, and business savvy.”

3. At first you will feel like you’ve just been given twenty dollars in change for a five, because you can put your book on Amazon whenever you want.

4. And when that feeling wears off, you realize, “Oh shit. It will be on Amazon whenever I put it there.” See #1.

5. When you publish yourself, it’s easier to remember that you are writing for readers, not for the approval of a system.

6. People will automatically assume your book sucks because it’s not from Random House. They could possibly be right. Therefore, do your best work and see #2 and #5. If they still assume your work sucks, thank them for their opinion, and then advise them under your breath to go to hell.

7. There are a lot of other indie-published writers. Yet indie publishing is an unknown phenomenon unless you are a writer or work in the publishing industry. We writers should work together to change that.

8. Put profiles on Twitter, Facebook, SPANnet.org, and the Association of Independent Publishers, and participate in a helpful way. Offer advice on subjects you understand, and ask questions about ones you don’t.

9. Start marketing your book early. Take advantage of all opportunities, but be careful not plug your work too often. Also remember that your threshold for “too often” is much higher than everyone else’s.

10. Get quality blurbs and reviews.

11. Never hesitate to ask people you trust for their opinion of the book before it goes to press. (See #2.) Those early readers are likely to tell you things you don’t want to hear, but at least they will be constructive about it, and you still have time to make changes.

12. Research your publishing options thoroughly. If you have a lazy streak, be honest with yourself about it, and check your work with an expert. (See #10). People are surprisingly helpful.

A flawed but earnest study of publishing methods

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

I have begun an unscientific experiment in publishing. It’s unscientific because the sample size is statistically insignificant, and I am comparing a nonfiction guide to a novel. But bear with me.

Participant A is my yet-unpublished novel, THE IDIOT’S TALE. I know you won’t take my word for it if I told you it’s a good book, so I’ll just say that by my own measures, it is a manuscript that I will still be proud of in ten years. Much like an intergalactic space probe, it is traveling through a great silent void known as the New York publishing industry, and we hopeful scientists can do nothing but wait a long time for word of its happy landing somewhere.

Participant B is my soon-to-be-printed THE EDITOR’S LEXICON: ESSENTIAL WRITING TERMS FOR NOVELISTS. It is a very brief dictionary of writing terms meant for fiction writers who have not studied writing in school, and early reviews by other editors and writers are strongly positive. I have decided to publish it independently, as an e-book through Smashwords, and as a print book through Lightning Source. My sole companion on this journey is my friend, client, and now publisher, William Campbell of Glyd-Evans Press.

As a writer, my three main goals are to (1) dedicate as much of myself as possible to a craft without losing my sanity, (2) be read, and (3) make a living at it. Therefore, this experiment will take many years to complete. It will compare ease of publication, the effort and expense to promote each book, profit, and my overall satisfaction with the final result—in other words, “Was it worth it? Should I have done it differently? Do I feel like I’ve connected with an audience? Which route would I recommend to others?”

Right now, I can only collect data from Participant B. I will be posting it over the next few weeks, as THE EDITOR’S LEXICON approaches its publication date. As for Participant A, it has entered a shaky orbit around one particular agent, but it’s traversing the dark side of that moon and we can only hope that a positive signal will reach our satellites by this time next month.

Future of publishing, from Random House editor of 40 years

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Jason Epstein, editorial director of Random House for 40 years, has written his forecast for the publishing industry in the digital age (New York Review of Books, March 11, 2010). Here are excerpts from the lengthy article.

On e-books:

[The digital books marketplace] will be very large, very diverse, and very surprising: its cultural impact cannot be imagined. E-books will be a significant factor in this uncertain future, but actual books printed and bound will continue to be the irreplaceable repository of our collective wisdom.

On creativity:

Works of genius will emerge from parts of the world where books have barely penetrated before.

On selling one’s work:

As conglomerates resist the exorbitant demands of best-selling authors … these authors, with the help of agents and business managers, will become their own publishers, retaining all net proceeds from digital as well as traditional sales.

On booksellers:

With the Espresso Book Machine, enterprising retail booksellers may become publishers themselves, like their eighteenth-century forebears.

On the necessity of the publishing industry:

It is fair to say that book publishing is more than a business. Without the contents of our libraries—our collective backlist, our cultural memory—our civilization would collapse.

On books, morality, and censorship:

The industry that Gutenberg launched eventually made possible wide distribution of Montaigne, Shakespeare, and Cervantes, to say nothing of [I]Babar the Elephant [/I]and [I]The Cat in the Hat[/I]. But his technology also gave us [I]The Protocols of the Elders of Zion[/I], [I]Mein Kampf[/I], and the nonsense that turned Pol Pot in Paris from a mere fool into a mass murderer. Digitization will amplify our better nature but also its diabolic opposite. Censorship is not the answer to these evils.

On the future form of literature:

Though bloggers anticipate a diversity of communal projects and new kinds of expression, literary form has been remarkably conservative throughout its long history while the act of reading abhors distraction, such as the Web-based enhancements—musical accompaniment, animation, critical commentary, and other metadata—that some prophets of the digital age foresee as profitable sidelines for content providers.

When a network works, how many works can a network sell?

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Declan Burke, an Irish author I hadn’t heard of until today, is a great example of either (a) a writer with lots of quality friends who diligently read his blog; (b) a writer who is about to be inordinately successful with his forthcoming self-published noir novel; or (c) both.

While self-immersing in a Cat 5 data stream, looking for self-publishing trends, I happened upon Burke’s blog, Crime Always Pays. Recently, he blogged his decision to self-publish A GONZO NOIR. The manuscript must be solid enough, judging by its blurb from John Banville and the number of near-misses in the traditional publishing industry. Good for him, I thought; then, scrolling down, found no fewer than 15 comments from his friends, each one ordering multiple copies of his book. Holy cow.

Maybe he is just that good, and his friends know it. Or maybe it’s Ireland; I lived there for a summer, and many people were unusually blithe about spending money to be nice. I know for certain, however, here on the tail end of a day’s research, that I haven’t seen a blog work so well or so immediately for a writer anywhere else. Good luck, Declan!