publishing

Beta e-book launch!

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

edlex-front-cover-copyAs part of my hands-on research in the world of e-books and self-publishing, I have posted a short multi-format e-book for novelists on Smashwords.com. The Editor’s Lexicon: Essential Terms for Novelists contains over 175 of the most common editing terms I use in the course of my work. I wrote it in response to many clients’ questions about writing jargon, and if it is popular, I will print a physical book this spring.

The Editor’s Lexicon is available for sample or purchase on the Smashwords.com site (link above). I welcome any ideas about this “beta” edition!

Dani Shapiro on how the market is letting us down

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

In today’s LA Times, author Dani Shapiro laments the failure of the midlist.

The emphasis is on publishing, not on creating. On being a writer, not on writing itself. The publishing industry — always the nerdy distant cousin of the rest of media — has the same blockbuster-or-bust mentality of television networks and movie studios. There now exist only two possibilities: immediate and large-scale success, or none at all. There is no time to write in the cold, much less for 10 years.

It reminds me of something Don Delillo said in his recent Wall Street Journal interview, “I don’t think my first novel would have been published as I submitted it today. I don’t think an editor would have read 50 pages of it,” he says. What gives? Similar thoughts have led me to believe that the publishing industry is letting down many good writers–and in doing so, serves neither the writer nor the reader. While its selectivity has made generations of writers toughen up and write better, the arbiter of a book’s quality really ought to be the readers for whom it is written.

(Emiliano Ponzi, for The Times, 1.27.2010)

(Emiliano Ponzi, for The Times, 1.27.2010)

Again, this is why I see a future in which the big publishing houses become secondary publishers and mass marketers; and professional writers adopt self-publishing and local marketing as a way to sell their work, have an audience, and use their talent to participate in their communities. As a writer, editor and writing teacher, I have also seen how much of a young or new writer’s time and talent can be wasted writing to the industry or literary canon instead of to readers. The practice of again remembering and writing to our audiences might also recalibrate what the next generation expects from their work; and more important, foster the future Don Delillos, Dani Shapiros, Ann Beatties, et al., so that literature is still considered one of the arts, and not merely entertainment.

I think so, too.

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Agent Nathan Bransford says it’s a great time to be an author and entrepreneur. I’m cheering in the same crowd.

Having worked with some remarkable, professional authors who self-publish their work, I know that a savvy writer can put out a book and at least break even. It makes me wonder what would happen if literature became more local, and more democratic. Editors, agents, and book designers aren’t going away, but I can’t help thinking that more of the profit would end up in writers’ hands if they wrote with local audiences in mind (geographically local, and/or to their circles online), and self-published.

We get at truth through specificity, and I hardly think our work would suffer if we practiced paying better attention to the struggles–class, political, social, and personal–closer to home. This could be my own frustration surfacing. In my own writing, I grapple with adapting foreign subject matter to a very Western form of storytelling; when I get stuck, I get antsy, and wonder if I am overlooking equally important narratives on my doorstep. Maybe so, yet I would not be writing about the Middle East if I didn’t believe that our country’s failures did not resemble certain other human rights failures abroad.

Speaking from a creative perspective, we writers receive our inspiration locally. By setting out to write local, too, we could expand our readership. From a human perspective, local literature builds community. Portland claims as heroes its local writers–Ursula Le Guin, Diana Abu-Jaber, and Kim Stafford, to name a few. From a business perspective, I believe marketing our books would be easier and more successful. Word of mouth is the best advertising we can have, and from a spiritual and ethical perspective, it serves us to let our best work speak for itself and to avoid the cheap language of marketing and self-interest.

Self-publishing, and likely e-publishing, remove several filters that separate writers from their audiences. I can’t help thinking that we can reinvigorate literature by writing more directly and urgently to a tangible audience–to the communities in which we already participate. I see many aspiring writers who write to agents and publishers, or to the literary canon. What good is that, really? It sets young writers on a path to failure and frustration, rather than encourage them to say something helpful to their readers about the shared world.

  • Archives