submissions

…longed for the rhythmic pounding of the surf, and the salty sea air.*

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009
Pacific Street, Rockaway Beach, Oregon

Pacific Street, Rockaway Beach, Oregon

What news? Pending my annual, five-day writing retreat at Rockaway Beach, I wanted to update my blog in grand Internet fashion: using a lot of words to say, basically, nothing much. Reseach on Book 2 continues at a loping pace thanks to Matt Beynon Rees, the prolific former Jerusalem bureau chief for TIME, whose information-dense Website and Palestinian mystery novels are giving me a lot of reading to do.

The weeklong retreat is meant as a turbo-outlining session, which means I ought to know what the novel is actually about in ten days or fewer. However, an agent promised to send revision notes on THE IDIOT’S TALE, and if those show up before I shut down my e-mail for a week, I will instead be knitting loose seams in the novel’s final third — all the while burning palm leaves, chanting quietly, Dear God please let it be good enough.

What other news? I finished my longest bike ever, at 80 miles. I turned the heat on in my office for the first time. E and I made killer fajitas, grilled corn, and mulled cider. Hello, autumn.

* We continue with our nascent endeavor to title every post using narrative cliches.

And then the alarm went off, and the dream faded, and green numbers said it was time to get up.*

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

At the beginning of August, I joked with Jeffrey Richards that we’d come to the month where we stop counting rejection letters, and just collect the out-of-office replies. Like the therapists, the literary agents go away–and so, it seemed, did my ambition. Four of my submissions are floating around greater Manhattan, and I haven’t done much about them. But Google Calendar just broke the news that it’s September.

E-mail submissions make the job practically an afterthought, so one can in theory stay on top of the process with only an hour’s work a week–browsing forthcoming titles, looking up listings on Publishers Marketplace and AgentQuery.com, and tweaking the query letter. Hit “send” and you’re done. That’s good news, because walking to the post office with a stack of envelopes containing My Manuscript made me feel like a a young Judy Davis in My Brilliant Career. Noob.

Meanwhile, for anyone who’s actually wondering: I’m working on the next novel, and set a deadline to slow down my research on October 6. (Slow it down? asks a voice. By that might you mean, “Put it in reverse?”). Anyway, the goal is to outline the plot during my week at the Colonyhouse, October 7-11, and begin writing sometime in November. I’ve been grappling with the problems of knowing what my characters will do but not who they are, and whether the novel should actually be set in Gaza, rather than kept in a speculative world.

And I’ve been camping. Running the trails in Forest Park. Going TV-shopping with E. Reading Audrey Niffenegger’s new novel. Writers are so boring from the outside.

* I wonder if it’s possible to title every post on this blog using narrative cliches.

Submissions update

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

A partial manuscript and full manuscript submission are still pending, and the good news of a few weeks ago (a cold query that turned into a request for a partial) came back with a form rejection last week. It’s been two months since the conference, and I am now wondering if I should query the remaining four agents from Backspace–just to keep this search from stagnating, and to prevent the May 30 conference from sliding even further into the distant past.

I’ve heard conflicting opinions about submitting queries in August. The publishing industry goes on vacation, say some. But other agents say they use the quiet month to catch up on queries, and that it is actually a good time to submit work. Any writers out there have personal experience with this?

Throwing away good news

Friday, July 17th, 2009

In a rush to get through the mail, I noticed my own handwriting on a #10 envelope. Always a bad sign when you have material on submission.

So, determined not to let it distract me from E’s departure for California, and repeating to myself Liz Rosenberg’s comment about “collecting your no’s,” I thumbed open the SASE, glanced at the brief form letter inside, stuffed it under my arm and waved goodbye to E.

I admit I was a little pissed. I took a considerable amount of time with the query, seeing as the agent represents a very good Palestinian-American novelist whose work I admire. As I climbed the stairs back to the apartment, I decided just to recycle the letter, make a note of the rejection in my Excel spreadsheet, and forget about it. But still. I only sent the dang thing a week ago. It must have barely seen the light of office ceiling before the agent’s assistant stuffed a rejection into my SASE.

But before dumping everything into the recycle bag, I took one more look. I read the letter again, and my eyes still went to the last line: “…forgive the form letter, but the volume of inquiries we receive obliges us to respond in this manner.” OK, just like every other rejection I’ve received in the mail. But this is weird, I thought–why is there an address in the body of the letter? So, I read it from the top.

Dear writer,

Thank you for your interest. Please do send the first 50 pages, a copy of this letter, and a SASE to…

Oh. They want a partial. In my letter I believe I’ll write

Dear agent,

Thank you for your interest. Your generous request for a partial nearly ruined my day. Enclosed please find the requested material.

Warm regards,
An optimist by nature
A writer by trade
A pessimist by training.

Submissions update

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

‘Nother rejection today. Kristin Nelson liked the first two pages when I read them aloud at the conference, but I got this note in my e-mail today: “You have a lot of talent. Ultimately I’m just an agent who leans a bit more commercial in her literary tastes. I know I’m not going to have the right vision for a work this literary.”

It’s another example of how subjective agents’ taste in manuscripts can be. My last rejection said the work was too commercial and not literary enough. So, onward! Out there somewhere is a bear that’s the right size for this bowl of porridge.

  • Archives