Writing

Why do we read?

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

Literary agent Rachelle Gardner asked on her blog what purpose books serve.

A few months ago, the subject came up between E and I on a long drive to the Naval Hospital in Bremerton, where she was going for eye surgery. I asked what novels are for, because I wondered how difficult it would be if my eyes were out of commission–how soon I would miss reading, and what I would miss about it most. E is a good person to bring your big questions to, because she never convolutes the answers.

Books are a form of entertainment. To writers, books are more than that–or at least I wish they were, but when I try to make them too much they get, well… convoluted. The conversation left me wishing for a deeper definition of entertainment, but really, we have the penny romances that fed gossip-hungry 18th-century socialites to thank for the market that later gave us Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Mrs. Dalloway, Lolita, 1984, and all the rest. Your thoughts?

1711 title page.

1711 title page.

On rediscovering the art of bad writing

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

I used to hate first drafts. I hated them because when you write them, everything you learned not to do slips past your inner editor, supplying you with endless free refills of angsty metaphors and an all-you-can-eat buffet of bad paragraphs. Then your inner editor notices that you’re writing dreck, and she gets all puckery and cuts you off completely. Some call this writer’s block, but you don’t call it that because, as your inner editor has reminded you tartly, “writer’s block” is also a cliche. Nothing makes a writer feel worse than a first draft.

But this time, it helps to have finished a novel already. It’s easier to dismiss the editor and accept Anne Lamott’s permission to write shitty first drafts. It also helps to have finished an outline and synopsis of the new novel, and know that my shitty first draft is the equivalent of wandering around on the wrong street of the right neighborhood.

It’s too early to say if the new novel is going well, but I am enjoying the writing process more than I expected. Every draft is a chance to try a new method, and this time is different, too: even though there’s a plan, the characters still need voices, and the novel still needs to find its tone. I’m trying to write each chapter as it comes, then go back and revise it for scene structure and character development. Mainly I’m trying to have fun and experiment freely, because the inner editor hates fun and is all about the rules.

More than anything else, writing is better than not writing. While researching and outlining, I missed the moments in the shower or in the grocery line when my mind wandered to whatever problem I left unsolved that morning. I missed the sense of losing track of time. I missed listening to my draft, and responding–and I missed watching first drafts turn into second drafts that eventually turned into a novel.

It's just as possible to have fun here...

It's just as possible to have fun here...

...as it is to have fun out here.

...as it is to have fun out here.

Future of publishing, from Random House editor of 40 years

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Jason Epstein, editorial director of Random House for 40 years, has written his forecast for the publishing industry in the digital age (New York Review of Books, March 11, 2010). Here are excerpts from the lengthy article.

On e-books:

[The digital books marketplace] will be very large, very diverse, and very surprising: its cultural impact cannot be imagined. E-books will be a significant factor in this uncertain future, but actual books printed and bound will continue to be the irreplaceable repository of our collective wisdom.

On creativity:

Works of genius will emerge from parts of the world where books have barely penetrated before.

On selling one’s work:

As conglomerates resist the exorbitant demands of best-selling authors … these authors, with the help of agents and business managers, will become their own publishers, retaining all net proceeds from digital as well as traditional sales.

On booksellers:

With the Espresso Book Machine, enterprising retail booksellers may become publishers themselves, like their eighteenth-century forebears.

On the necessity of the publishing industry:

It is fair to say that book publishing is more than a business. Without the contents of our libraries—our collective backlist, our cultural memory—our civilization would collapse.

On books, morality, and censorship:

The industry that Gutenberg launched eventually made possible wide distribution of Montaigne, Shakespeare, and Cervantes, to say nothing of [I]Babar the Elephant [/I]and [I]The Cat in the Hat[/I]. But his technology also gave us [I]The Protocols of the Elders of Zion[/I], [I]Mein Kampf[/I], and the nonsense that turned Pol Pot in Paris from a mere fool into a mass murderer. Digitization will amplify our better nature but also its diabolic opposite. Censorship is not the answer to these evils.

On the future form of literature:

Though bloggers anticipate a diversity of communal projects and new kinds of expression, literary form has been remarkably conservative throughout its long history while the act of reading abhors distraction, such as the Web-based enhancements—musical accompaniment, animation, critical commentary, and other metadata—that some prophets of the digital age foresee as profitable sidelines for content providers.

When a network works, how many works can a network sell?

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Declan Burke, an Irish author I hadn’t heard of until today, is a great example of either (a) a writer with lots of quality friends who diligently read his blog; (b) a writer who is about to be inordinately successful with his forthcoming self-published noir novel; or (c) both.

While self-immersing in a Cat 5 data stream, looking for self-publishing trends, I happened upon Burke’s blog, Crime Always Pays. Recently, he blogged his decision to self-publish A GONZO NOIR. The manuscript must be solid enough, judging by its blurb from John Banville and the number of near-misses in the traditional publishing industry. Good for him, I thought; then, scrolling down, found no fewer than 15 comments from his friends, each one ordering multiple copies of his book. Holy cow.

Maybe he is just that good, and his friends know it. Or maybe it’s Ireland; I lived there for a summer, and many people were unusually blithe about spending money to be nice. I know for certain, however, here on the tail end of a day’s research, that I haven’t seen a blog work so well or so immediately for a writer anywhere else. Good luck, Declan!

Beta e-book launch!

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

edlex-front-cover-copyAs part of my hands-on research in the world of e-books and self-publishing, I have posted a short multi-format e-book for novelists on Smashwords.com. The Editor’s Lexicon: Essential Terms for Novelists contains over 175 of the most common editing terms I use in the course of my work. I wrote it in response to many clients’ questions about writing jargon, and if it is popular, I will print a physical book this spring.

The Editor’s Lexicon is available for sample or purchase on the Smashwords.com site (link above). I welcome any ideas about this “beta” edition!